Citywire’s Nicole Piper explores the structural soundness of interval funds and their lack of popularity in recent years in her new article, “Gatekeepers debate the pros and cons of interval funds.” The article features insights from a variety of asset management professionals, who debate the pros and cons of the structure in theory and in practice.
Interval funds are a type of closed-end fund that are non-listed and continuously offered. They provide liquidity to shareholders through periodic repurchases that occur at specified “intervals,” typically every three, six or 12 months. This limited liquidity requirement allows the interval fund structure to house less-liquid alternative investments, which may have the ability to generate liquidity premiums over more liquid assets.
Kimberly Flynn, XA Investments Managing Director of Alternative Investments, contributes to the article, offering one explanation for the lack of widespread popularity for interval funds offering alternative investments. “If you’re in a continuous inflow situation, you’re not worried about meeting redemptions, but I think there was some frustration [in 2020], because people get gated,” she said of the outflows from interval funds witnessed last year. “Some of the sponsors and sales teams, I think, sell them like mutual funds, and if it’s sold like a mutual fund and you get gated, it’s upsetting and you have to find liquidity elsewhere.”
To read the full article, please click here.
To read XAI’s white paper on Interval Funds, please click here.
Risks
The information in this article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, investment or other professional advice on any subject matter. Further, the information is not all-inclusive and should not be relied upon as such. An investment in CEFs involves risks, including loss of principal. Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than performance data quoted. Diversification does not eliminate the risk of experiencing investment losses. You should not use this communication as a substitute for your own judgment, and you should consult professional advisors before making any investment decisions. This information may contain “forward looking” information that is not purely historical in nature, including projections, forecasts, estimates of market returns, and proposed portfolio compositions. There is no guarantee that any forecasts will come to pass. This information does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to sell or buy any specific security offering. Such an offering is made by the applicable prospectus only. A prospectus should be read carefully by an investor before investing. Investors are advised to consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. Financial advisors should determine if the risks associated with an investment are consistent with their client’s investment objectives.